In over 16-day hearing in Sabarimala reference case, the Supreme Court heard the issues ranging from judicial review, ...
Supreme Court hears Sabarimala case, emphasising judicial review of religious practices; judgment reserved after extensive ...
After 16 days hearings, the Supreme Court today reserved its verdict in the Sabarimala reference. The 9-judge bench today ...
The Supreme Court made the observation while discussing the interplay between Articles 15, 16, 25 and 26 of the Constitution.
Centre asserts all religious practices are protected unless they breach public order, health, or morality, in Sabarimala ...
Justice Nagarathna said, 'That is why Hinduism is called as a way of life. It is not necessary for a Hindu to mandatorily go ...
The Bench is also examining the ambit of religious freedom practised by various faiths, including the Dawoodi Bohra community ...
On the 14th day of hearings in the Sabarimala reference, Senior Advocate Jaideep Gupta, appearing for the State of Kerala, ...
The Supreme Court on Wednesday questioned how a non-believer from North India can claim the right of entry to Sabarimala temple. SC observed that while deciding the issue of who can enter the ...
The court is reviewing its own 2018 verdict that had lifted the prohibition on women between the ages of 10 and 50 years from ...
PN Narayana Varma, representative of the Pandalam royal family, demanded that cases registered against Sabarimala devotees ...
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday said that a nine-judge bench will commence final hearing on a batch of petitions relating to discrimination against women in religions and at religious places, ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results